XERF
A focus on firmness. Definition, considered.
Non-invasive monopolar radiofrequency platform for multi-depth soft-tissue heating and skin tightening.
Your medical assessment determines suitability.
- 016.78 MHz + 2 MHz frequencies
- 02Wave Fit™ + cryogen cooling
- 033 depth settings + 10 intensity levels
Areas of application
Facial & neck laxity · Jawline & jowl definition · Fine lines & wrinkles
An informed choice.
What the evidence can tell you — and where its limits matter.
Sources checkedEvidence & expectations
An early XERF study retrospectively followed 16 women for up to three months. It reported improvements in laxity and some skin-quality measurements, without a control group; one author disclosed a manufacturer training role. The authors call the findings preliminary.[1]
Preparation & recovery
Discuss implants, previous procedures and any condition affecting the treatment area. Ask what sensations and visible changes to expect, and how the proposed applicator determines recovery and follow-up.[2]
Risks & limitations
Energy-based procedures can cause pain, swelling, burns or unwanted tissue effects. Eligibility and risks depend on the modality and body site. Non-invasive does not mean risk-free or equivalent to surgery.[2]
Compare your options
A result observed after XERF alone does not establish the additional benefit of pairing it with a laser. Compare the separate firmness and surface goals before discussing a combined sequence.[1]
Different approaches to discuss
These links explain different targets. They are not personalised recommendations.
K-LUXEUltraformer MPT ultrasound liftingSources & further reading
- Clinical studyXERF: retrospective objective and subjective evaluationErlich et al. · Lasers in Medical Science · 2026
- Regulatory safety informationNon-invasive body contouring technologiesFDA
- Manufacturer informationXERF: platform informationCynosure LutronicManufacturer information explains the platform or named protocol; it is not independent evidence of clinical benefit.
How we use evidence
A controlled trial compares interventions in defined groups; an uncontrolled cohort cannot, alone, establish causality. A review depends on the quality of its included studies. We distinguish these sources from manufacturer information and identify when findings do not directly apply to the platform or protocol.
The date records when sources were checked for this guide. It is not a statement of individual clinical review, product authorisation or confirmation of the clinic’s available configuration.
This guide supports a conversation with your clinician. It does not determine your suitability or replace individual aftercare instructions.
Regulatory sources describe their own jurisdictions; a US authorisation or warning does not determine a product’s legal status in Portugal.
Where this technology fits.
Explore the treatment pathways that use this platform, including the sequence and what to discuss at your assessment.